The Orlando killer wasn't on a “no-fly” list.
He wasn't being currently investigated by the FBI.
He passed numerous background checks, and was a licensed security guard in a courthouse.
Thus, no amount of proposed federal gun control could have prevented the Orlando terrorist from purchasing a gun.
This killer WAS an ISIS-loving terrorist who openly expressed his desire to engage in mass murder prior to his 911 declaration from the Pulse nightclub.
He WAS the subject of an FBI investigation two years ago, and the FBI gave him a pass.
And he committed his atrocity in a Gun-Free Zone, where all the victims were disarmed by law.And there is this:
The Obama reaction to the Orlando kill-fest is typical, he warns us not to annoy the Moslems—apparently he believes we must get his permission first—then he insults and attacks us.
This time Obama pivoted to gun control. He never misses a chance to kick ordinary people in the shins so he can enjoy their pain.
Nor do the gays and lesbians, a catastrophically unwise choice in the long term, my opinion, but it was theirs to make.
Taking their cue from Obama's DC, the shin-kicking anti-gun machine is cranked up to ten and the weak sisters are bailing.
How's this ban on the phrase "Islamic terrorism" supposed to work? We refer to "the N-word" and similar now, shall we add "the I-word"?
Shall we say it was "I-word terrorism", or what? Will news articles use I*****c terrorism?
Does DC have a clue how retarded—oops—r******d this stuff sounds to normal people?